| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-02-14
|
| Emphasis |
L: LOCALTARG, P: LOCALTARG
|
| Case Closed |
2018-01-30
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-08-01 |
| Current Penalty |
5070.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5070.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-30 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
20 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): a) At the jobsite, on the scaffolding, on or about 2/14/17: The employer did not ensure that a working platform on a scaffold was fully planked when workers were clearing ice from an adjacent gutter 11 stories from grade and 6 feet from the lower level. b) At the jobsite, on scaffolding located in the inside courtyard, on or about 2/14/17: The employer did not ensure that an access platform for a stair-tower was not fully planked 10 stories from grade and 6 feet from the lower level. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G04 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-08-01 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
20 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4): Guardrail systems installed to meet the requirements of this section did not comply with the provisions listed in subparagraphs (i) through (xv) of this paragraph. a) At the jobsite, on the scaffolding, on or about 2/14/17: The employer did not ensure that mid-rails were installed on scaffolding adjacent to working levels. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-08-01 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5070.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
20 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(1): The top edge height of the top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, was not 42 inches (1.1 m) plus or minus 3 inches (8 cm) above the walking/working level: a) At the jobsite, on the roof, on or about 2/14/17: A wire rope top-rail was measured at 24 inches and found to deflect more than 6 inches when tested. This section of guard rail was adjacent to a loading area 12 stories from grade. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 B02 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-08-01 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
20 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(2): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structure members were not installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working surface when there was no wall or parapet wall at least 21 inches (53 cm) high. a) At the jobsite, on the roof, on or about 2/14/17: A wire rope mid-rail was held down onto the deck by bags of roofing materials and subsequently not located at a midpoint between the top-rail and the roof deck. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D11 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-08-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-08-07 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
20 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(11): Lifelines were not protected against being cut or abraded: a) At the jobsite, on the penthouse roof, on or about 2/14/17: A lifeline was wrapped around steel I-beam as an anchorage, and the line was not protected from being cut or abraded against the steel edges. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002D |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D15 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-08-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-08-07 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
20 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person. a) At the jobsite, on the roof, on or about 2/14/17: A lifeline was wrapped around steel I-beam and knotted as an anchorage, and the Competent Person could not establish if that knot was capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds and could not establish if the anchorage could otherwise maintain a safety factor of at least two. |
|
|
