Name: | UPSTATE GENERAL CONTRACTING, LLC |
Jurisdiction: | New York |
Legal type: | DOMESTIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY |
Status: | Active |
Date of registration: | 20 May 2011 (14 years ago) |
Entity Number: | 4097237 |
ZIP code: | 13502 |
County: | Oneida |
Place of Formation: | New York |
Address: | 4 RIVERSIDE DRIVE #308, UTICA, NY, United States, 13502 |
Name | Role | Address |
---|---|---|
THE LLC | DOS Process Agent | 4 RIVERSIDE DRIVE #308, UTICA, NY, United States, 13502 |
Filing Number | Date Filed | Type | Effective Date |
---|---|---|---|
110520000601 | 2011-05-20 | ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION | 2011-05-20 |
Inspection Nr | Report ID | Date Opened | Site Address | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
341468338 | 0213100 | 2016-05-12 | 399 CONSAUL RD, SCHENECTADY, NY, 12304 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Citation ID | 01001 |
Citaton Type | Serious |
Standard Cited | 19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date | 2016-06-09 |
Current Penalty | 1700.0 |
Initial Penalty | 1700.0 |
Final Order | 2016-07-20 |
Nr Instances | 1 |
Nr Exposed | 2 |
Gravity | 5 |
FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Resident's roof, 399 Consaul Rd. Colonie, NY 12205- On or about May 12, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards of up to 18 feet without conventional fall protection. |
Inspection Type | Planned |
Scope | Complete |
Safety/Health | Safety |
Close Conference | 2012-03-21 |
Emphasis | L: FALL |
Case Closed | 2013-09-05 |
Related Activity
Type | Inspection |
Activity Nr | 282079 |
Safety | Yes |
Violation Items
Citation ID | 01001A |
Citaton Type | Serious |
Standard Cited | 19260503 A02 I |
Issuance Date | 2012-05-21 |
Abatement Due Date | 2012-05-26 |
Current Penalty | 1200.0 |
Initial Penalty | 2400.0 |
Final Order | 2012-06-14 |
Nr Instances | 1 |
Nr Exposed | 1 |
Gravity | 5 |
FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(i): The employer did no assure that each employee had been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the following areas, including the correct procedures for inspecting the fall protection systems to be used. A) Worksite - On or about March 21, 2012, roofers were not provided with adequate training to inspect personal fall arrest system components and remove damaged or worn components from service. |
Citation ID | 01001B |
Citaton Type | Serious |
Standard Cited | 19260502 D21 |
Issuance Date | 2012-05-21 |
Abatement Due Date | 2012-05-26 |
Current Penalty | 0.0 |
Initial Penalty | 0.0 |
Final Order | 2012-06-14 |
Nr Instances | 1 |
Nr Exposed | 1 |
Gravity | 5 |
FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service: A) Worksite - On or about March 21, 2012, a roofer was using a worn personal fall arrest harness that should have been removed from service. |
Citation ID | 01002A |
Citaton Type | Serious |
Standard Cited | 19260451 C02 V |
Issuance Date | 2012-05-21 |
Abatement Due Date | 2012-05-26 |
Current Penalty | 1200.0 |
Initial Penalty | 2400.0 |
Final Order | 2012-06-14 |
Nr Instances | 1 |
Nr Exposed | 3 |
Gravity | 5 |
FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts shall not be used to support scaffold platforms unless the entire platform is attached to the fork and the fork-lift is not moved horizontally while the platform is occupied: A) Worksite - On or about March 21, 2012, two employees were installing shingles from a job-made personnel platform resting on the forks of the SkyTrak 10054 rough-terrain forklift. This platform was not secured to the forks and the employees were exposed to a fall hazard. |
Citation ID | 01002B |
Citaton Type | Serious |
Standard Cited | 19260451 G01 VII |
Issuance Date | 2012-05-21 |
Abatement Due Date | 2012-05-26 |
Current Penalty | 0.0 |
Initial Penalty | 0.0 |
Final Order | 2012-06-14 |
Nr Instances | 1 |
Nr Exposed | 3 |
Gravity | 5 |
FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. A) Worksite - On or about March 21, 2012, two employees were installing shingles from a job-made personnel platform resting on the forks of the SkyTrak 10054 rough-terrain forklift; platform did not have a guardrail along the front edge; employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 13 feet. |
Date of last update: 27 Mar 2025
Sources: New York Secretary of State