Search icon

POWER HOME REMODELING GROUP, LLC

Company Details

Name: POWER HOME REMODELING GROUP, LLC
Jurisdiction: New York
Legal type: FOREIGN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Status: Active
Date of registration: 27 Jul 2012 (13 years ago)
Entity Number: 4276316
ZIP code: 12207
County: Suffolk
Place of Formation: Delaware
Address: 80 STATE STREET, ALBANY, NY, United States, 12207

Contact Details

Phone +1 610-874-5000

DOS Process Agent

Name Role Address
C/O CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DOS Process Agent 80 STATE STREET, ALBANY, NY, United States, 12207

Licenses

Number Status Type Date End date
2105453-DCA Active Business 2022-04-21 2025-02-28
1440776-DCA Inactive Business 2012-08-09 2021-02-28

History

Start date End date Type Value
2020-07-07 2024-07-02 Address 80 STATE STREET, ALBANY, NY, 12207, 2543, USA (Type of address: Service of Process)
2012-07-27 2020-07-07 Address 80 STATE STREET, ALBANY, NY, 12207, 2543, USA (Type of address: Service of Process)

Filings

Filing Number Date Filed Type Effective Date
240702000182 2024-07-02 BIENNIAL STATEMENT 2024-07-02
220719000700 2022-07-19 BIENNIAL STATEMENT 2022-07-01
200707061843 2020-07-07 BIENNIAL STATEMENT 2020-07-01
180705007445 2018-07-05 BIENNIAL STATEMENT 2018-07-01
140717006377 2014-07-17 BIENNIAL STATEMENT 2014-07-01
121003000498 2012-10-03 CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION 2012-10-03
120727000492 2012-07-27 APPLICATION OF AUTHORITY 2012-07-27

Inspections

Date Inspection Object Address Grade Type Institution Desctiption
2018-08-18 No data Staten Island, CHESTER, PA, 19013 No Violation Issued Inspectorate of the Department of Consumer and Workers' Rights Protection Department of Consumer and Worker Protection No data
2017-06-03 No data Staten Island, CHESTER, PA, 19013 No Violation Issued Inspectorate of the Department of Consumer and Workers' Rights Protection Department of Consumer and Worker Protection No data

Complaints

Start date End date Type Satisafaction Restitution Result
2022-09-09 2022-09-28 Quality of Work Yes 0.00 Goods Repaired
2022-08-05 2022-09-08 Quality of Work Yes 0.00 Resolved and Consumer Satisfied
2021-11-19 2022-01-11 Breach of Contract No 0.00 Advised to Sue
2021-07-30 2021-09-15 Quality of Work NA 0.00 No Consumer Response
2021-07-02 2021-08-27 Damaged Goods Yes 0.00 Goods Repaired
2020-10-09 2020-11-04 Breach of Contract NA 0.00 Complaint Invalid
2019-06-26 2019-07-25 Non-Delivery of Service Yes 0.00 Resolved and Consumer Satisfied
2019-03-08 2019-03-26 Quality of Work No 0.00 Advised to Sue
2017-05-16 2017-06-23 Misrepresentation Yes 0.00 Goods Repaired
2015-11-23 2016-02-02 Quality of Work No 0.00 Referred to Hearing

Fine And Fees

Fee Sequence Id Fee type Status Date Amount Description
3579178 RENEWAL INVOICED 2023-01-09 100 Home Improvement Contractor License Renewal Fee
3579177 TRUSTFUNDHIC INVOICED 2023-01-09 200 Home Improvement Contractor Trust Fund Enrollment Fee
3563076 PL VIO INVOICED 2022-12-06 1000 PL - Padlock Violation
3439718 LICENSE INVOICED 2022-04-20 50 Home Improvement Contractor License Fee
3435492 DCA-SUS CREDITED 2022-04-05 50 Suspense Account
3435491 PROCESSING INVOICED 2022-04-05 25 License Processing Fee
3394770 TRUSTFUNDHIC INVOICED 2021-12-10 200 Home Improvement Contractor Trust Fund Enrollment Fee
3394772 LICENSE CREDITED 2021-12-10 75 Home Improvement Contractor License Fee
3394771 EXAMHIC INVOICED 2021-12-10 50 Home Improvement Contractor Exam Fee
2964606 RENEWAL INVOICED 2019-01-18 100 Home Improvement Contractor License Renewal Fee

Issued Charges

Date Outcome Charge Charge count Counts sellted Counts guilty Counts not guilty
2022-11-10 Settlement (Pre-Hearing) UNLICENSED ACTIVITY 90 90 No data No data
2017-05-19 Settlement (Pre-Hearing) NO/IMPROPER WORKMAN'S COMP CERTIFICATE 1 1 No data No data
2017-05-19 Settlement (Pre-Hearing) Failed to perform work in a skillful or competent manner. 1 1 No data No data
2017-05-19 Settlement (Pre-Hearing) CONTRACTOR DETAIL NOT IN CONTRACT 1 1 No data No data
2017-05-19 Settlement (Pre-Hearing) IMPROPER TYPEFACE OR SIZE 1 1 No data No data

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
338994437 0214700 2013-04-03 401 BROADWAY, MASSAPEQUA, NY, 11758
Inspection Type Prog Other
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2013-04-03
Emphasis L: FALL, L: SANDY, P: FALL
Case Closed 2013-05-06

Related Activity

Type Inspection
Activity Nr 899031
Safety Yes
334940418 0214700 2012-06-28 237 SMITH STREET, MERRICK, NY, 11566
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2012-06-28
Emphasis L: FALL, N: CTARGET
Case Closed 2012-09-07

Related Activity

Type Complaint
Activity Nr 420850
Safety Yes
Type Inspection
Activity Nr 494098
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260100 A
Issuance Date 2012-08-07
Current Penalty 2000.0
Initial Penalty 4900.0
Final Order 2012-09-05
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) Worksite - An employee inspecting and directing work under on-going roof work did not have head protection. Roofwork included but was not limited to the installation of substrate and shingles, approximately 28 feet above the ground, on or about 06/28/12. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B13
Issuance Date 2012-08-07
Current Penalty 2500.0
Initial Penalty 4900.0
Final Order 2012-09-05
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Related Event Code (REC) Complaint
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) Note: If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. a) Worksite - An Employee was working on an approximately 14-12 pitch residential roof without fall protection. The employee was on the peak of the roof which was approximately 28 feet high; on or about 06/28/12 Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Citation ID 01003A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261053 B01
Issuance Date 2012-08-07
Current Penalty 2500.0
Initial Penalty 4900.0
Final Order 2012-09-05
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a) Worksite - An employee was using an unsecured ladder to gain access to a roof. The ladder was approximately 8 inches below the upper landing; on or about 06/28/12 Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Citation ID 01003B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261053 B05 I
Issuance Date 2012-08-07
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 4900.0
Final Order 2012-09-05
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the a) Worksite - An employee was using a ladder to access a roof. The ladder was on the landing approximately 10 feet above the ground, and the base of the ladder was approximately 9 feet 7 inches from the base of the house. The ladder exceeded the one-quarter working length angle, On or about 06/28/12. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.

Date of last update: 19 Feb 2025

Sources: New York Secretary of State