Search icon

ULISES CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Company Details

Name: ULISES CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Jurisdiction: New York
Legal type: DOMESTIC BUSINESS CORPORATION
Status: Active
Date of registration: 17 Jan 2013 (12 years ago)
Entity Number: 4347615
ZIP code: 11368
County: Queens
Place of Formation: New York
Address: 106-16 34TH AVENUE, CORONA, NY, United States, 11368

Contact Details

Phone +1 646-945-0101

Phone +1 347-408-7497

Shares Details

Shares issued 200

Share Par Value 0

Type NO PAR VALUE

DOS Process Agent

Name Role Address
ULISES SANCHEZ DOS Process Agent 106-16 34TH AVENUE, CORONA, NY, United States, 11368

Licenses

Number Status Type Date End date
1460809-DCA Inactive Business 2013-03-27 2015-02-28
1286433-DCA Inactive Business 2008-05-21 2017-02-28

Filings

Filing Number Date Filed Type Effective Date
130117000775 2013-01-17 CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 2013-01-17

Fine And Fees

Fee Sequence Id Fee type Status Date Amount Description
1926915 RENEWAL INVOICED 2014-12-30 100 Home Improvement Contractor License Renewal Fee
1926914 TRUSTFUNDHIC INVOICED 2014-12-30 200 Home Improvement Contractor Trust Fund Enrollment Fee
882304 TRUSTFUNDHIC INVOICED 2013-07-03 200 Home Improvement Contractor Trust Fund Enrollment Fee
934178 RENEWAL INVOICED 2013-07-03 100 Home Improvement Contractor License Renewal Fee
1236137 RENEWAL INVOICED 2013-06-28 75 Home Improvement Contractor License Renewal Fee
1236136 TRUSTFUNDHIC INVOICED 2013-03-27 200 Home Improvement Contractor Trust Fund Enrollment Fee
1236134 FINGERPRINT INVOICED 2013-03-27 75 Fingerprint Fee
1236135 LICENSE INVOICED 2013-03-27 25 Home Improvement Contractor License Fee
882305 TRUSTFUNDHIC INVOICED 2011-04-15 200 Home Improvement Contractor Trust Fund Enrollment Fee
934179 RENEWAL INVOICED 2011-04-15 100 Home Improvement Contractor License Renewal Fee

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
340051150 0216000 2014-10-27 1040 METCALF AVE., BRONX, NY, 10462
Inspection Type Referral
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2014-10-28
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2018-03-19

Related Activity

Type Referral
Activity Nr 918660
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260021 B02
Issuance Date 2014-11-07
Current Penalty 2000.0
Initial Penalty 2000.0
Final Order 2015-02-12
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: On or about 10/27/2014, Metcalf Ave. a) The employees were not provided safety and health training as required by the standard.
Citation ID 01002A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 E01
Issuance Date 2014-11-07
Current Penalty 2400.0
Initial Penalty 2400.0
Final Order 2015-02-12
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used: On or about 10/27/2014, Metcalf Ave a) The employee(s) did not use proper access when descending the pump jack scaffold.
Citation ID 01002B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261053 B01
Issuance Date 2014-11-07
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2015-02-12
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access; or, when such an extension was not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that would not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support: On or about 10/27/2014, Metcalf Ave. a) The 8' aluminum extension ladder did not extend above the landing exposing the employee to a 13' fall hazard.
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 G01 VII
Issuance Date 2014-11-07
Current Penalty 2800.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2015-02-12
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee was not protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: On or about 10/27/2014, Metcalf Ave. a) The employee worked on the pump jack scaffold, approximately 16' high without fall protection.
Citation ID 01004
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260452 J02
Issuance Date 2014-11-07
Current Penalty 2000.0
Initial Penalty 2000.0
Final Order 2015-02-12
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. When the pump jack has to pass bracing already installed, an additional brace was not installed approximately 4 feet (1.2 m) above the brace to be passed, and was not left in place until the pump jack had been moved and the original brace reinstalled: On or about 10/27/2014, Metcalf Ave. a) The pump jack did not have the triangular bracing at the bottom of the scaffold.

Date of last update: 26 Mar 2025

Sources: New York Secretary of State