| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2015-09-14
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2019-07-31
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
1017701 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260021 B02 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-09-22 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-20 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: On or about 9/3/2015, Washington Street a) The employees were not provided training as required by the standard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260100 A |
| Issuance Date |
2015-09-22 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-20 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On or about 9/3/2015, Washington Street a) The two employees working below scaffold/roof were not wearing hard hats. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-09-22 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-20 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: On or about 9/3/2015, Washington Street a) The employees were working on two different roofs which were 11'4" and 13' high. They were not protected from falling off the roof. |
|
|
