|
346236490
|
0216000
|
2022-09-21
|
64 LINCOLN AVE., NEW ROCHELLE, NY, 10801
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Other
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2022-09-21
|
| Emphasis |
L: LOCALTARG, P: LOCALTARG
|
| Case Closed |
2022-09-30
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1623641 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
|
|
342938370
|
0216000
|
2018-02-08
|
869 E 147TH ST., BRONX, NY, 10455
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2018-02-08
|
| Emphasis |
N: CTARGET, P: CTARGET
|
| Case Closed |
2025-01-29
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1296257 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1293805 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 C03 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-13 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
2340.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3880.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(3): Supported scaffold poles, legs, post, frames, and/or uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement: location: 9th floor on or about: 2/8/18 a) Scaffold frames were connected by one rather than two crossbraces. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B03 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-13 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
5460.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
9054.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(3): Each employee in a hoist area was not protected from falling 6 feet (1.8m) or more to lower levels by guardrail systems or personal fall arrest systems: location: 9th floor, hoist area on or about: 2/8/18 a) Employees, moving material on and off the hoist, were not adequately protected from falling 84'6" to the ground. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19. |
|
|
|
342962578
|
0216000
|
2018-02-08
|
869 E 147TH ST., BRONX, NY, 10455
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2018-02-08
|
| Emphasis |
N: CTARGET, P: CTARGET
|
| Case Closed |
2019-07-29
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1293837 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-06-08 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3298.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2018-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx, NY: An employee mixing and pouring concrete was required to wear respiratory protection (e.g., N95 respirator) and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program; on or about 2/8/18. b) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx, NY: Two employees drilling into brick with hand-held rotary impact drill with an integrated HEPA filtered vacuum system were required to wear respiratory protection (e.g. N95 respirator) and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program; on or about 4/19/18. c) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx, NY: An employee cutting bricks with a wet-saw and another employee mixing and pouring concrete were both required to wear respiratory protection (e.g., N95 respirator) and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program; on or about 5/8/18. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-06-08 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2018-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx, NY: An employee mixing and pouring concrete was required to wear respiratory protection (e.g., N95 respirator) and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use respiratory protection; on or about 2/8/18. b) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx, NY: Two employees drilling into brick with hand-held rotary impact drill with an integrated HEPA filter dust collection system were required to wear respiratory protection (e.g. N95 respirator) and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees' ability to use respiratory protection; on or about 4/19/18. c) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx, NY: An employee cutting bricks with a wet-saw and another employee mixing and pouring concrete were both required to wear respiratory protection (e.g., N95 respirator) and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees' ability to use respiratory protection; on or about 5/8/18. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261153 H01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2018-06-08 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2018-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1153(h)(1)(i): The employer did not make medical surveillance available at no cost to the employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for each employee who was required under this section to use a respirator for 30 or more days per year: a) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx, An employee was using a portable wet saw to cut block was required to wear respiratory protection for greater than 30 days (e.g., N95 respirator) and the employer did not make medical surveillance available to the employee; on or about 2/8/17. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260052 D01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-06-08 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-01-17 |
| Current Penalty |
4000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4398.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2018-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.52(d)(1): In all cases where the sound levels exceeded the values shown in Table D-2 of 29 CFR 1926.52, a continuing, effective hearing conservation program was not administered: a) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx, NY: An employee cutting bricks using a wet-masonry saw was exposed to noise levels in excess of the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit of 90 dBA on 5/7/18. The employee was exposed to a continuous noise level of 95.6 dBA as an 8 hour Time Weighted Average (TWA), which was equivalent to 218.6% of the Permissible Exposure Limit. The sampling time was 370 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. The employer did not administer a continuing an effective hearing conservation program which included noise monitoring and audiometric testing; on or about 5/7/18. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261153 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-06-08 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-01-17 |
| Current Penalty |
3000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3298.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2018-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan: a) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx, Employees were using a portable wet saw to cut block and the employer did not establish and implement a written silica exposure control plan; on or about 2/8/18. b) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx, NY: Two employees were drilling into brick with hand-held rotary impact drill with an integrated HEPA filtration system and the employer did not establish and implement a written silica exposure control plan; on or about 4/19/18. c) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx, NY: An employee was cutting bricks with a wet-saw and the employer did not establish and implement a written silica exposure control plan; on or about 4/19/18. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261153 I02 I D |
| Issuance Date |
2018-06-08 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3298.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2018-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(2)(i)(D): The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the contents of this section: a) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx: An employees was using a portable wet saw to cut block and the employer did not ensure that the employees could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the OSHA Respirable Crystalline Silica Standard 29 CFR 1926.1153; on or about 2/8/18. b) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx, NY: Two employees were drilling into brick with hand-held rotary impact drill with an integrated HEPA filtration system and the employer did not ensure that the employees could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the OSHA Respirable Crystalline Silica Standard 29 CFR 1926.1153; on or about 4/19/18. c) 869 East 147th Street, Bronx, NY: An employee was cutting bricks with a wet-saw and the employer did not ensure that the employees could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the OSHA Respirable Crystalline Silica Standard 29 CFR 1926.1153; on or about 4/19/18. |
|
|
|
342924784
|
0216000
|
2018-01-31
|
545 E. 166TH ST., BRONX, NY, 10456
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2018-01-31
|
| Emphasis |
N: CTARGET, P: CTARGET
|
| Case Closed |
2018-07-11
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1296242 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-13 |
| Current Penalty |
1000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3298.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-16 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. location: basement on or about: 1/31/18 a) An employee used a walk through frame and crossbrace to access the scaffold. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19. |
|
|
|
342962420
|
0216000
|
2018-01-31
|
545 E. 166TH ST., BRONX, NY, 10456
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2018-01-31
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1292478 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-06-13 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3298.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2018-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) 545 East 166th Street, Bronx, NY: An employee mixing and pouring concrete was required to wear respiratory protection (e.g., N95 respirator) and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program; on or about 1/31/18. b) 545 East 166th Street, Bronx, NY: An employee cutting bricks with a wet-saw was required to wear respiratory protection (e.g., N95 respirator) and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program; on or about 1/31/18. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-06-13 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2018-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) 545 East 166th Street, Bronx, NY: An employee mixing and pouring concrete was required to wear respiratory protection (e.g., N95 respirator) and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use respiratory protection; on or about 1/31/18. b) 545 East 166th Street, Bronx, NY: An employee cutting block with a wet-saw was required to wear respiratory protection (e.g., N95 respirator) and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use respiratory protection; on or about 1/31/18. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261153 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-06-13 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-01-17 |
| Current Penalty |
3000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3298.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2018-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan: a) 545 East 166th Street, Bronx, NY: An employees was using a portable wet saw to cut block and the employer did not establish and implement a written silica exposure control plan; on or about 1/31/18. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261153 I02 I D |
| Issuance Date |
2018-06-13 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3298.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-07-06 |
| Final Order |
2018-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(2)(i)(D): The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the contents of this section: a) 545 East 166th Street, Bronx, NY: An employees was using a portable wet saw to cut block and the employer could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the OSHA Respirable Crystalline Silica Standard 29 CFR 1926.1153; on or about 1/31/18. |
|
|
