Search icon

THE CHEMOURS COMPANY

Company Details

Name: THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
Jurisdiction: New York
Legal type: FOREIGN BUSINESS CORPORATION
Status: Active
Date of registration: 04 Jun 2015 (10 years ago)
Entity Number: 4769483
ZIP code: 10005
County: New York
Place of Formation: Delaware
Address: 28 LIBERTY ST., NEW YORK, NY, United States, 10005
Principal Address: 1007 MARKET STREET, WILMINGTON, DE, United States, 19899

Agent

Name Role Address
C T CORPORATION SYSTEM Agent 28 LIBERTY ST., NEW YORK, NY, 10005

DOS Process Agent

Name Role Address
THE CHEMOURS COMPANY DOS Process Agent 28 LIBERTY ST., NEW YORK, NY, United States, 10005

Chief Executive Officer

Name Role Address
MARK E. NEWMAN Chief Executive Officer 1007 MARKET STREET, WILMINGTON, DE, United States, 19801

History

Start date End date Type Value
2023-06-19 2023-06-19 Address 1007 MARKET STREET, WILMINGTON, DE, 19801, USA (Type of address: Chief Executive Officer)
2023-06-19 2023-06-19 Address 1007 MARKET STREET, WILMINGTON, DE, 19899, USA (Type of address: Chief Executive Officer)
2019-06-04 2023-06-19 Address 28 LIBERTY ST., NEW YORK, NY, 10005, USA (Type of address: Service of Process)
2019-01-28 2023-06-19 Address 28 LIBERTY ST., NEW YORK, NY, 10005, USA (Type of address: Registered Agent)
2019-01-28 2019-06-04 Address 28 LIBERTY ST., NEW YORK, NY, 10005, USA (Type of address: Service of Process)
2017-07-14 2023-06-19 Address 1007 MARKET STREET, WILMINGTON, DE, 19899, USA (Type of address: Chief Executive Officer)
2015-06-04 2019-01-28 Address 111 EIGHTH AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY, 10011, USA (Type of address: Service of Process)
2015-06-04 2019-01-28 Address 111 EIGHTH AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY, 10011, USA (Type of address: Registered Agent)

Filings

Filing Number Date Filed Type Effective Date
230619000153 2023-06-19 BIENNIAL STATEMENT 2023-06-01
210719001771 2021-07-19 BIENNIAL STATEMENT 2021-07-19
190604060456 2019-06-04 BIENNIAL STATEMENT 2019-06-01
SR-71684 2019-01-28 CERTIFICATE OF CHANGE (BY AGENT) 2019-01-28
SR-71683 2019-01-28 CERTIFICATE OF CHANGE (BY AGENT) 2019-01-28
170714006281 2017-07-14 BIENNIAL STATEMENT 2017-06-01
150604000557 2015-06-04 APPLICATION OF AUTHORITY 2015-06-04

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
340858810 0213600 2015-08-18 BUFFALO AVENUE & 26TH STREET, NIAGARA FALLS, NY, 14302
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Health
Close Conference 2015-08-18
Case Closed 2016-01-26

Related Activity

Type Inspection
Activity Nr 1085919
Health Yes
Type Complaint
Activity Nr 1008652
Health Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 5A0001
Issuance Date 2015-09-30
Abatement Due Date 2016-01-20
Current Penalty 6000.0
Initial Penalty 6000.0
Final Order 2015-12-01
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Related Event Code (REC) Complaint
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to contact and chemical burns from sodium hydroxide: a) Caustic Tank Pad Area - On or about 07/31/2015, Chemours did not take steps to ensure that subcontractor required contract workers to wear an acid suit (chemical protective clothing) where they had the potential for exposure to a solution comprised in part of sodium hydroxide.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100132 D01 I
Issuance Date 2015-09-30
Abatement Due Date 2015-10-12
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 6000.0
Final Order 2015-12-01
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Related Event Code (REC) Complaint
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): When the employer had assessed the workplace hazard(s) and determined that hazard(s) were present, the employer did not select the type of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee form a liquid caustic material: a) Caustic Tank Pad Area - On or about 7/31/15, the employer did not perform an appropriate hazard assessment to determine what hazards contract employees would be exposed to while applying a chemical resistant coating to the floor and walls of the Caustic Tank Pad Area. Contract employees were exposed to liquid sodium hydroxide solution 30-54% and the assessment performed by the employer identified required full body protection as a Nomex (flame resistant), not a rain suit or other fluid resistant material. A contract employee sustained third degree chemical burns to their shins which required skin grafts. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Citation ID 01003A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19101200 H03 II
Issuance Date 2015-09-30
Abatement Due Date 2015-10-12
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 6000.0
Final Order 2015-12-01
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Related Event Code (REC) Complaint
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) a) Caustic Tank Pad Area - On or about 7/31/15, contract employees were exposed to sodium hydroxide 30-54% and the employer's training to not include the physical hazards of the chemical. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Citation ID 01003B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19101200 H03 III
Issuance Date 2015-09-30
Abatement Due Date 2016-01-20
Current Penalty 6000.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2015-12-01
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Related Event Code (REC) Complaint
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) a) Caustic Tank Pad Area - On or about 7/31/15, employer did not train contractor workers on the appropriate personal protective equipment to use when working in an area where there was exposure to a solution comprised in part of sodium hydroxide. The Nomex (flame retardant) suits work by the contractor workers did not provide adequate protection from the solution comprised in part of sodium hydroxide. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED

Date of last update: 25 Mar 2025

Sources: New York Secretary of State