| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-03-15 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-09 |
| Current Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3696.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-06-05 |
| Final Order |
2018-11-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103) (a) On or about 09/20/2017, at the site, for the employees performing scrapping and painting operations and were required to use respirators such as a N95 3M VFlex and an elastomeric half-face respirator. The employer did not develop and implement a respiratory protection program. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-03-15 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-19 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-06-05 |
| Final Order |
2018-11-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103) (a) On or about 09/20/2017, at the site, for the employees performing scrapping and painting operations and were required to use respirators such as a N95 3M VFlex and an elastomeric half-face respirator. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation for the respirator users. Note: The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 K |
| Issuance Date |
2018-03-15 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-05-01 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-06-05 |
| Final Order |
2018-11-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: (Construction Reference 1926.103) (a) On or about 09/20/2017, at the site, for the employees performing scrapping and painting operations and were required to use respirators such as a N95 3M VFlex and an elastomeric half-face respirator. The employer did not provide comprehensive training to the employees at least annually. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-03-15 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-19 |
| Current Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2956.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-06-05 |
| Final Order |
2018-11-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) On or about 09/20/2017, at the site, for the employees performing scrapping of lead contacting paint and painting operations with water base paints and primers. The employer did not develop a hazard communication program to cover the hazards of the chemicals the employees work with or are exposed to in their work area. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-03-15 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-04 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-06-05 |
| Final Order |
2018-11-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) On or about 09/20/2017, at the site, for the employees performing scrapping lead contacting paint and painting operations with water base paints and primers. The employer did not develop a hazard communication program to cover the hazards of the chemicals the employees work with or are exposed to in their work area. Employees were not provided with information and training on the hazards of the chemicals they work with or are exposed to in their work area. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260062 L01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2018-03-15 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-19 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-06-05 |
| Final Order |
2018-11-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i): The employer did not include lead in the program established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (� 1910.1200): a) On or about 09/20/2017, at the site, for the employees performing scrapping of lead-contacting paint. The employer did not develop a hazard communication program to cover the hazards of the chemicals the employees work with or are exposed to in their work area to include lead hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260062 D01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2018-03-15 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-12-09 |
| Current Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3696.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-06-05 |
| Final Order |
2018-11-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA): a) On or about 09/20/2017, at the site, for the employees performing scrapping of lead-contacting paint. Employees were exposed to lead while manually scrapping lead-containing paint. The employer did not conduct initial assessment of employees exposures to lead. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260062 D02 V D |
| Issuance Date |
2018-03-15 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-12-10 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-06-05 |
| Final Order |
2018-11-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(D): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with hand washing facilities in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5): a) On or about 09/20/2017, at the site, for the employees performing scrapping of lead-contacting paint. Employees were exposed to lead while manually scrapping lead-containing paint. The employer did not provide any hand washing facilities. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260062 D02 V F |
| Issuance Date |
2018-03-15 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-12-10 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-06-05 |
| Final Order |
2018-11-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(F): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with training in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.21, Safety training and education: a) On or about 09/20/2017, at the site, for the employees performing scrapping of lead-contacting paint. Employees were exposed to lead while manually scrapping lead-containing paint. The employer did not provide safety training and education for the employees to identify lead hazards at the site. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003D |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260062 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-03-15 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-12-10 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2018-06-05 |
| Final Order |
2018-11-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.62(g)(1): Where employees were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit, without regard to the use of respirators; where employees were exposed to lead compounds which may cause skin or eye irritation (e.g. lead arsenate, lead azide); and as interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2), the employer did not provide at no cost to the employee and ensure that each employee used appropriate protective work clothing and equipment that prevented contamination of the employee and the employee's garments: a) On or about 09/20/2017, at the site, for the employees performing scrapping of lead-contacting paint. Employees were exposed to lead while manually scrapping lead-containing paint. Employees were observed wearing street clothes and employer did not provide tyvek or coveralls. |
|
