|
346087810
|
0215800
|
2022-07-19
|
110 SUNFLOWER DRIVE, LIVERPOOL, NY, 13088
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2022-07-19
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1921479 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1608784 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 H01 V |
| Issuance Date |
2022-11-22 |
| Current Penalty |
1823.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3646.0 |
| Contest Date |
2022-12-07 |
| Final Order |
2024-10-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(v): The safety monitor had other responsibilities which could take the monitor's attention from the monitoring function: a) 110 Sunflower Drive, Liverpool, NY 13088: On or about July 19, 2022, while employees were performing roofing activities on a 4/12 pitch roof, the fall monitor was working on the ground, looking away from the roof. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 H01 III |
| Issuance Date |
2022-11-22 |
| Current Penalty |
3646.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
7293.0 |
| Contest Date |
2022-12-07 |
| Final Order |
2024-10-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(iii): The safety monitor was not on the same walking/working surface and within visual sighting distance of the employee being monitored. a) 110 Sunflower Drive, Liverpool, NY 13088: On or about July 19, 2022, while employees were performing roofing activities on a 4/12 pitch roof, the fall monitor was working on the ground looking away from the roof. The Roofing Guys was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(iii)), which was contained in OSHA inspection number_1532855, citation number 1, Item number 1c and was affirmed as a final order on (12/17/21), with respect to a workplace located at 7330 Eastman Road, North Syracuse, 13212. |
|
|
|
346042310
|
0215800
|
2022-06-21
|
103 SANDRA DRIVE, SYRACUSE, NY, 13212
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2022-06-21
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-11-17 |
| Current Penalty |
1823.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3646.0 |
| Contest Date |
2023-01-16 |
| Final Order |
2024-10-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) 103 Sandra Drive, Syracuse NY: On or about 6/21/2022, the employer did not provide ladders for roof access that were 3 feet above the upper landing surface, exposing workers to falls of greater than 8 feet. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Willful |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-11-17 |
| Current Penalty |
28006.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
54694.0 |
| Contest Date |
2023-01-16 |
| Final Order |
2024-10-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) 103 Sandra Drive, Syracuse NY: On or about 6/21/2022, the employer did not provide fall protection to employee while installing roofing materials on a 6/12 roof that had a fall distance of about 7-8 ft. The Roofing Guys were previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (1926.501 (b) (13)), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1186106, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 3/27/2018, with respect to a workplace located at 2293 Markland Road, Lafayette, NY. |
|
|
|
346020647
|
0215800
|
2022-06-13
|
CHURCH OF THE LIVING WORD 6099 COURT STREET ROAD, SYRACUSE, NY, 13206
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2022-06-13
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1602092 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1602077 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1602099 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-12-13 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2023-02-01 |
| Current Penalty |
15952.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
31904.0 |
| Contest Date |
2023-01-03 |
| Final Order |
2024-10-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
24 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Church of the Living Word, 6099 Court Street Road, Syracuse, NY 13206, on or about 6/13/22: Workers were stripping and installing new roofing material to 30,000 square feet of roof, with a 4:12 pitch and a lower level to eave height of 10 feet and ground to eave heights of 12 feet, without fall protection of any kind. Abatement documentation is required for this item. The Roofing Guys was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.502(h)(iii) and 1926.502(h)(v), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1532855, citation number 1, item number 1, and citation number 1, item number 2, and was affirmed as a final order on 12/17/21, with respect to a workplace located at Lan-Co Companies, 7330 Eastman Road, North Syracuse, NY 13212. |
|
|
|
345328553
|
0215800
|
2021-05-24
|
LAN-CO COMPANIES 7330 EASTMAN ROAD, NORTH SYRACUSE, NY, 13212
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2021-05-24
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 B10 |
| Issuance Date |
2021-11-23 |
| Current Penalty |
8191.8 |
| Initial Penalty |
13653.0 |
| Final Order |
2021-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
15 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(10):Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slop roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. a) Lan-Co companies, 7330 Eastman Road, North Syracuse, NY 13212, on or about 5/24/21: Employees were performing roofing work on three low slope and adjoining sections of roof that measured 72 feet by 32 feet, 56 feet by 64 feet, joined by 40 feet by 32 feet, where a single monitor was assigned and no warning lines were utilized. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 H01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2021-11-23 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2021-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
15 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(i): The safety monitor was not competent to recognize fall hazards; a) Lan-Co Companies, 7330 Eastman Road, North Syracuse, NY 13212, on or about 5/24/21: The assigned safety monitor did not maintain line of sight of roofers at the edge of the roof located at the North-East extreme of the building. The monitor maintained his line of sight in the direction where the majority of the crew was working and did not recognize the need to maintain line of sight with all workers on the roof. b) Lan-Co Companies, 7330 Eastman Road, North Syracuse, NY 13212, on or about 5/24/21: The assigned safety monitor did not maintain line of sight of roofers at the edge of the roof located at the South-East extreme of the building. The monitor maintained his line of sight in the direction where the majority of the crew was working. The monitor could not have seen the workers in this location from his location and did not recognize the need to maintain line of sight with all workers on the roof. c) Lan-Co Companies, 7330 Eastman Road, North Syracuse, NY 13212, on or about 5/24/21: The assigned safety monitor did not maintain line of sight of roofers at the edge of and at the adjoining section of roof on the East facing part of the building. The monitor maintained his line of sight in the direction where the majority of the crew was working and did not recognize the need to maintain line of sight with all workers on the roof. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 H01 III |
| Issuance Date |
2021-11-23 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2021-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
15 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(iii): The safety monitor was not on the same walking/working surface and within visual sighting distance of the employee being monitored. a) Lan-Co Companies, 7330 Eastman Road, North Syracuse, NY 13212, at the northeast extreme of the building, on or about 5/24/21: The assigned safety monitor was not on the same work level and did not maintain line of sight of roofers at the edge of the roof. b) Lan-Co Companies, 7330 Eastman Road, North Syracuse, NY 13212, at the southeast extreme of the building, on or about 5/24/21: The assigned safety monitor was not on the same work level and did not maintain line of sight of roofers at the edge of the roof. c) Lan-Co Companies, 7330 Eastman Road, North Syracuse, NY 13212, at the east-facing and adjoining section of roof, on or about 5/24/21: The assigned safety monitor was not on the same work level and did not maintain line of sight of roofers at the edge of the roof. |
|
|
|
341861060
|
0215800
|
2016-10-19
|
2293 MARKLAND ROAD, LA FAYETTE, NY, 13084
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-10-19
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2022-06-22
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
1146217 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A02 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-01-19 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-01-31 |
| Current Penalty |
3575.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5577.0 |
| Contest Date |
2017-01-25 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii): a) On or about 10/6/2016, At the jobsite: An employee performing roofing work was exposed to falls of approximately 20 feet. The employee was not provided with any fall protection training. Abatement documentation is required for this item. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-01-19 |
| Current Penalty |
17875.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
27885.0 |
| Contest Date |
2017-01-25 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about 10/6/2016 , At the jobsite: An employee was working on the roof of a bay window without the use of fall protection. Employee was exposed and experienced a fall of approximately 14 feet to the ground. The Roofing Guys was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1059105, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 10/13/2016, with respect to a workplace located at 4412 Lathrop Drive, Marcellus NY. The Roofing Guys was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 942969, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 7/14/2016, with respect to a workplace located at 4436 Ashfield Terrace, Syracuse NY. |
|
| Citation ID |
03001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19040039 A02 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-01-19 |
| Current Penalty |
2554.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3984.0 |
| Contest Date |
2017-01-25 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer failed to report the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, within (24) twenty-four hours: a) On or about 10/7/2016: The employer did not report the hospitalization of an employee within 24 hours of the employee being admitted to the hospital on 10/6/16. |
|
|
|
341837813
|
0215800
|
2016-10-14
|
27 ELDERKIN AVE, CAMILLUS, NY, 13031
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-10-14
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2016-10-14
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1146080 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
|
|
341387926
|
0215800
|
2016-04-08
|
100 GULF RD, CAMILLUS, NY, 13031
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-04-08
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2023-02-15
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-10-03 |
| Current Penalty |
43967.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
68591.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-10-14 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-27 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). a) 100 Gulf Rd, Camillus, NY 13031, On or about 4/8/16: The employer did not ensure that fall protection was used while performing roofing installation activities on a 6/12 pitch roof that had a fall distance of 20 feet. The Roofing Guys, Inc. was previously cited for a serious violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard CFR1926.501(b)(13) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 983577 , citation number 2, item number 1c and was affirmed as a final order on 11/13/15 with respect to a workplace located at 3622 Southeast Townline Rd, Marcellus, NY. 13108. The Roofing Guys, Inc. was previously cited for a repeat serious violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (29CFR1926.501(b)(13)), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1059105, citation number 2, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on 10/13/15 with respect to a workplace located at 4412 Lathrop Dr, Marcellus, NY. 13108. The Roofing Guys, Inc. was previously cited for a Other Than Serious violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard CFR1926.501(b)(13) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 921490, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 10/17/14 with respect to a workplace located at 1123 Cold Springs Rd, Liverpool, NY 13088 The Roofing Guys, Inc. was previously cited for a Willful-serious violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard CFR1926.501(b)(13) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 942969, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 8/18/14 with respect to a workplace located at 4436 Ashfield Terrace, Syracuse, NY 13215 The Roofing Guys, Inc. was previously cited for a serious violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard CFR 1926.501(b)(13) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 283054, citation number 2, item number 1a and was affirmed as a final order on 9/23/11 with respect to a workplace located at 113 Willis Ave. Syracuse, NY 13204. The Roofing Guys, Inc. was previously cited for a serious violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard CFR1926.501(b)(13) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315849273, citation number 2, item number 1a and was affirmed as a final order on 11/14/11 with respect to a workplace located at 129 Iron Oak Circle, North Syracuse, NY, NY 13212. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, the employer must submit documents describing the steps it is taking to ensure compliance with the requirement to provide and install fall protection systems, including a description of how these steps will protect its employees from fall hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-10-03 |
| Current Penalty |
17586.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
27436.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-10-14 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. 100 Gulf Rd, Camillus, NY13031, Roof access ladder, On or about 4/8/16: The employer did not ensure that a ladder, that was used for roof access, was extended to at least 3 feet above the landing surface of the roofs edge. The Roofing Guys were previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315849273 , citation number 01, item number 2a and was affirmed as a final order on 4/25/12 , with respect to a workplace located at 129 Iron Oak Circle., North Syracuse, NY 13212. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, the employer must submit documents describing the steps it is taking to ensure compliance with the requirement to provide and install fall protection systems, including a description of how these steps will protect its employees from fall hazards. |
|
|
|
341079408
|
0215800
|
2015-11-23
|
200 LIME STREET, SYRACUSE, NY, 13202
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2015-11-23
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2015-11-24
|
|
|
339006322
|
0215800
|
2013-04-10
|
410 W. MORELAND RD, SYRACUSE, NY, 13204
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2013-04-10
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2014-06-03
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260100 A |
| Issuance Date |
2013-08-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-09-04 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1760.0 |
| Contest Date |
2013-09-11 |
| Final Order |
2014-04-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) At the jobsite, on or about 4/10/13: An employee climbing the ladder the ladder jack scaffold system was not wearing a hard hat. Other employees were working above with nail guns, hammers and roofing materials. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2013-08-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2200.0 |
| Contest Date |
2013-09-11 |
| Final Order |
2014-04-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary: a) At the jobsite, on or about 4/10/13: The aluminum scaffold plank used as a work platform left a space greater than 1 inch on the open side of the plank. The scaffold supports are adjustable so the space could have been closed. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B05 II |
| Issuance Date |
2013-08-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2200.0 |
| Contest Date |
2013-09-11 |
| Final Order |
2014-04-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilevered end: a) At the jobsite, on or about 4/10/13: The ends of the ladder jack scaffolding being used extended past the support more than 18 inches. The area of the overhang was not blocked to prevent employee access. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-08-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-09-04 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3080.0 |
| Contest Date |
2013-09-11 |
| Final Order |
2014-04-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: a) At the jobsite, on or about 4/10/13: Employees were working from a ladder jack scaffold 21 feet above grade without any means of a fall protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260452 K01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-08-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2200.0 |
| Contest Date |
2013-09-11 |
| Final Order |
2014-04-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Ladder jack scaffold platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m) a) At the jobsite, on or about 4/10/13, employees were working from ladder jack scaffold in excess of 20 feet. |
|
| Citation ID |
01006 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260452 K05 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-08-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2200.0 |
| Contest Date |
2013-09-11 |
| Final Order |
2014-04-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Scaffold platforms were bridged on to another. a) At the jobsite, on or about 4/10/13: 2 sections of the ladder jack scaffold planks were bridged together to form 1 long run. |
|
| Citation ID |
01007 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261051 A |
| Issuance Date |
2013-08-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3080.0 |
| Contest Date |
2013-09-11 |
| Final Order |
2014-04-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): A stairway or ladder shall be provided at all personnel points of access where there is a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist is provided: a) At the jobsite, on or about 4/10/13: Employees accessing the roof work area from the ladder jack scaffolding had to step more than 24 inches to the eave of the roof. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-08-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-09-04 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
6160.0 |
| Contest Date |
2013-09-11 |
| Final Order |
2014-04-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: a) At the jobsite, on or about 4/10/13: Employees engaged in roofing work on a 8/12 sloped roof were not protected from falling 25 feet to grade. The Roofing Guys was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (name previously cited standard), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315849273, citation number 1, item number 1b and was affirmed as a final order on 4/25/12, with respect to a workplace located at 129 Iron Oak Circle, North Syracuse, NY. |
|
|
